Question o Italy

  Ask a Question
Ask a question
Experts and experienced tourists will answer
+ Add question details
785 subscribers will be
notified of the issue
Topics questionа

Related question «General issues»
A question for connoisseurs of Italy - which cities are worth seeing (North of Italy)?
There is a vacation for 8-10 days in May. The choice fell on Italy. On one's own. Arrival to Venice. Departure is most likely also from Venice, and possibly from Milan (still looking at options). We want to take 4 days to Rome, Venice 2 or 3. What else is worth seeing? Florence, or maybe Turin? How many days per city?
I foresee that someone will say that even a month will not be enough for Rome, let alone 4 days. However, I would like to see more. We plan to travel around the country by train.
Please help me with the itinerary.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
4 subscribers  • asked 2013-01-2312 years ago
Answers  •  5
аватар alex45
Last year we had such a route - Venice - 2 days at the carnival, then by train to Rome (3 days). then by train to Genoa. From Genoa we had a sea cruise, returned to Genoa, then Milan and Venice. From Venice, you can first go to Florence before Rome. Here in the reports there is about this trip, read it. The trip was also independent, maybe something of interest, I wrote in detail.
аватар KaterynaSH
Since your time is limited and there are already 2 cities in mind, I advise you to also see Florence and if you take a flight from Milan, then it. We traveled around Italy in our car, so we had the opportunity to visit Siena, Pisa, Turin and a bunch of other small towns. In such cities, one does not need much time for sightseeing, so we managed to visit 2 cities a day.
аватар Yaroslavas
I think that the idea of ​​​​arriving in Venice and departing from Milan is a great idea for a budget flight with Vizer)) I support you that Rome should be given as much time as possible. In 4 days, you can do a lot if you want. For Venice, 1-2 days is enough. I do not recommend you to spend much time there. The city is beautiful, but there are not many attractions, so the main thing for you is to walk around the city, eat local food and soak up this unforgettable atmosphere. The city is beautiful, but very monotonous. Florence is a much more culturally interesting city. I also liked Turin. For Milan, 1 day will also be enough. Here, of course, the main thing is shopping and visiting the opera, if you are a fan)) By the way, the famous "Last Supper" is also here)) From Turin, as well as from Milan, you can go to Bergamo (Yes, Trufaldino lived right here). Very beautiful old Italian town. We got a lot of pleasure. Good luck!))
аватар alex45
By the way, it is not necessary, but definitely in Bergamo. since the Wizzies fly from there to Kyiv, and not from Malpensa in Milan. And there are quite enough sights in Venice, rather Venice is a city of interest. 2 days is just a superficial look at it and a ride through the canals. , because I practically did not see the art museums of Venice, the islands around Venice. But for starters, 2 days in Venice will do.
аватар Janny25
Thanks everyone for the replies! Having moderated our desire to embrace the immensity, we settled on the following: Venice (almost the whole day of arrival) - Florence (2 nights) - Rome (4 Nights) - Venice (1 night). In Venice, you get a total of 2 days, but torn apart.
If we understand that we can go to Pisa from Florence, then we will go, but if we don’t want to, then no.
avatar
Answer other questions about Italy
Add photo
Loading...
Photo uploaded
×
All questions
UAE
more