Question o Ukraine

  Ask a Question
Ask a question
Experts and experienced tourists will answer
+ Add question details
7234 subscribers will be
notified of the issue

Related question «Travel agencies and operators»
Interested in your opinion - "the best travel agency website"
Interested in beauty and ease of use for tourists. Thanks!
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
9 subscribers  • asked 2009-08-1615 years ago
Answers  •  15
аватар Tet.A_sv
In my opinion, SAGI has the best site. In addition to a very good design, tour descriptions, amenities, there is also a sea tour. information on countries, and on hotels, and simply interesting materials on the topic of tourism.
аватар Gudik
Pilot
аватар Pachok
Turtesse, Incomarthur, Gamalia
аватар HotLine
But are beauty and convenience the main parameters in the assessment?
Look at the world leaders - there has long been no place for such decorations as the operators listed above have.
A site can be beautiful but useless. Convenient, but with a minimum of information. With a maximum of information, but the inability to use it. Etc.
Therefore, when determining the best site, you first need to determine the criteria and their priorities.
Yes, and the sites of travel agencies - it's not interesting. It's about like the question - which of the grocery stores is the best site?
Travel portals are interesting. Sites of operators - it is interesting. But there is something to talk about - for whom these sites are created and work. For traveler or agent.
In general, this is not a topic for this section of turpravda. It needs to be moved to the forum.
аватар Pachok
Yes, two criteria actually! Informative and easy to use. "Beauty" as an added bonus :)
аватар anna4866
Thanks for the answers, but I do not agree with only one statement that a travel agency does not need a website. The site is the exact same advertisement in the newspaper, only for those who do not read newspapers. I just plan to order a site for myself - I was interested in the opinion of professionals.
аватар Nastenka87
TEZ TOUR
аватар HotLine
And who wrote here that the agency does not need a website?
Now about agencies.
Look at the answers. No agency website has been named. A site of the operator type will not suit you.
аватар LaFifa
As a tourist, I like the Saga site the most :)
аватар Pachok
HotLine, well, wait, and SAGA, and Inkomartur, and Gamalia sell their tours not only through agents, but also directly to tourists, i.e. their sites serve as agency sites for tourists.
аватар HotLine
That is why they lost the competition to well-built businesses. Although they all had a head start - they were known in the market before the arrival of today's outbound tourism leaders. Here is CAM, Yana, etc. To take an example from those who have lost market share, has ceased to be a prestigious brand? This is at least wrong.
But even if we assume that Saga has a good website, then what can the agency take from it? Description of other people's tours? Alien prices?
Look at the travel section of the site rating (in Ukraine, the main bigmir.net).
In general, the conversation becomes purely professional. I already wrote - it's not for this
branches.
аватар Zlata28
If we talk specifically about the convenience of the site
then for me this site is Turtessa
Very convenient, you can see not only open source software
and a description of the hotel, and then the reviews of tourists
аватар Pachok
HotLine You mixed everything together. You cannot compare, say, Incomart and Saga with Turtes and Teztur. Yes, let them tell me a hundred times that Turtesse is the leader, and for a trip to Norway, I will turn to Saga. for Switzerland - to Incomart. How can warm compete with wet? These are different categories.
And, in general, the question is not about whether the “pioneers” built their businesses correctly, but about how CONVENIENT the sites of travel agencies are for TOURISTS. For example, as a tourist, I categorically dislike the Teztour website, the tour search function is inconvenient there and the results are given in an inconvenient form.
You write: "But even assuming that Saga has a good website, what can the agency take from it? Description of other people's tours? Other people's prices?" I repeat once again - Saga has other tasks, first of all - attracting TOURISTS.
аватар Natalo4ka
Turtess. A very convenient tour search system, a description of the hotel - and then reviews, no need to jump and look for something.
аватар HotLine
Pachok's answer.
I saw a bunch in your answer.
We do not discuss who has the best tours to Norway or Switzerland. I'm talking about the outbound tourism market. By the way, on September 3, TEZ is holding a seminar on Austria, and Norway and Switzerland will also attend there. Nobody overtook TEZ, but he overtook others.
I am not an apologist for TEZ. I took it as an example, as an effective company. They were the first to make a normal tour selection system and online booking. And they won big on it. And those who did not understand this in time - lost.
This is a forced response to Pachok's remarks.
In general, I wrote about something else. If one sentence, then the operator's site cannot be an example for the agency.
You can talk about which of the operators has the best operator site. What information should the agent's website contain. How can a tourist look for answers to their questions on the Internet.
But the Saga site cannot be a template for an agent site. It can be a model for the operator's website, which not only forms tours on its own, but also sells them on its own.
avatar
Answer other questions about Ukraine
Add photo
Loading...
Photo uploaded
×
All questions
UAE
Ukraine
Arabat Spit Berdyansk Boryspil Chernigiv Dnipro Donetsk Gribovka Kamianets-Podilskyi Kharkiv Khmilnyk Koblevo Kyiv Kyrylivka Lazurne Lviv Morshyn Myrhorod Odesa Prymorsk Sataniv Sergeevka Shatsk Shidnitsya Skadovsk Svyatogorsk Truskavets Uman Zaliznyi Port Zatoka
more
more