Question o Turkey
Ask a Question
Ask a question
Related question «Documents and borders»
international passport
Dear experts! On July 1, she got married, she never changed her passport. We are flying to Turkey the other day, can there be problems at the Russian customs? I naturally took my husband's surname.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
Answers • 11
A citizen of the Russian Federation to cross the border of the Russian Federation needs ONLY a valid international passport. it all depends on the country where you go, Turkey is possible. Visa, Schengen - no
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
yes, it's impossible not to believe this answer :)))))))
Although this is true. At customs, you only need a passport. passport. Civil when traveling to Turkey, no one asks. And if you don’t shout at the passport control at the top of your voice that you changed your last name a long time ago, then no one will know about it. There will be no problems. But the Turks do not care at all, the main thing is that the money for the visa is paid.
Although this is true. At customs, you only need a passport. passport. Civil when traveling to Turkey, no one asks. And if you don’t shout at the passport control at the top of your voice that you changed your last name a long time ago, then no one will know about it. There will be no problems. But the Turks do not care at all, the main thing is that the money for the visa is paid.
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
Was in a similar situation. Everything rolled. The only shame was that, to be honest, there would have been honeymoon gifts, shows, etc. But you need to choose: either a trip without all this, or stay at home to make a new passport. By the way, it’s great that I didn’t have time to change my foreign passport and rights, otherwise I would have to change everything back))))
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
To the last post. And that gifts and shows are distributed at the border? And what, there are no married women who have retained their maiden name?
In fact, the hotel (where there are shows and gifts) is not interested in the surname, but the status of the newlyweds. After all, there are no real newlyweds who come to the hotel with new passports. In our country, for example, the vast majority of newlyweds fly on a tour on the second or third day after the wedding. We warn the hotel about this and they are congratulated there. Without looking at the passports and without requiring a marriage certificate.
In fact, the hotel (where there are shows and gifts) is not interested in the surname, but the status of the newlyweds. After all, there are no real newlyweds who come to the hotel with new passports. In our country, for example, the vast majority of newlyweds fly on a tour on the second or third day after the wedding. We warn the hotel about this and they are congratulated there. Without looking at the passports and without requiring a marriage certificate.
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
If you work in the tourism industry, you know very well that gifts are not distributed at the border. And why these questions? And for being loyal to customers - thank you, well done !!! And I prudently did not show my civil passport and marriage certificate even at the travel agency, drawing up a contract for my spouse. And they did not admit that we were flying on a honeymoon. On duty, I know about the consequences and problems in case of mismatch of documents or their incorrect execution.
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
That's why I answered in the form of questions, since your delusion is obvious. Sorry for the term. But I don't want others to repeat it.
Once again about the logic of the topic.
All the problems that may be for visa-free countries arise at the border, and you have refused the additional hotel service.
Border guards cannot determine whether you are married or not. And even more so, what surname did you decide to take when you got married. They only check the validity of the passport (its validity) and the absence of injunctions on exit.
This knowledge is not special - everyone who crosses the border should know this.
That's why I reacted that way. I just wanted to show the obviousness of the situation for the service for the newlyweds.
The following fact is more special - no regulatory document establishes the obligation and terms for replacing a passport when changing a surname.
This is due to the status of this document - it is not mandatory for life.
Once again about the logic of the topic.
All the problems that may be for visa-free countries arise at the border, and you have refused the additional hotel service.
Border guards cannot determine whether you are married or not. And even more so, what surname did you decide to take when you got married. They only check the validity of the passport (its validity) and the absence of injunctions on exit.
This knowledge is not special - everyone who crosses the border should know this.
That's why I reacted that way. I just wanted to show the obviousness of the situation for the service for the newlyweds.
The following fact is more special - no regulatory document establishes the obligation and terms for replacing a passport when changing a surname.
This is due to the status of this document - it is not mandatory for life.
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
I don’t know how it is in Russia, but in Ukraine a civil passport must be replaced within a month, i.e. if you are going on a tour a day after the wedding, then even your civil passport for the old surname is still valid, despite the fact that the surname has changed, not to mention the international passport.
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
here we are considering a situation where a girl got married six months ago, and this is a completely different matter from a legal point of view
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
to teradut - The girl has already been answered above.
The last posts were a reaction to your answer. I don't want anyone to repeat your scenario, as this is a delusion. I see that you are trying to argue something with the term "from a legal point of view".
Then I'll repeat it again. From a legal point of view - "no regulatory document establishes the obligation and terms for replacing a passport when changing a surname." As it is not forbidden, for example, to use diplomas, certificates with a maiden name.
Understand correctly, I do not argue with you. My task is different - to voice reliable information and explain the principle of the system. It is clear for what purpose.
The last posts were a reaction to your answer. I don't want anyone to repeat your scenario, as this is a delusion. I see that you are trying to argue something with the term "from a legal point of view".
Then I'll repeat it again. From a legal point of view - "no regulatory document establishes the obligation and terms for replacing a passport when changing a surname." As it is not forbidden, for example, to use diplomas, certificates with a maiden name.
Understand correctly, I do not argue with you. My task is different - to voice reliable information and explain the principle of the system. It is clear for what purpose.
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago