Question o Sri lanka
Ask a Question
Ask a question
Related question «Hotel selection»
Hotels Koggala Beach and Long Beach - who was, which is better?
Hotels Koggala Beach and Long Beach - who was, which is better?
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
Answers • 12
Almost the same. Located nearby. Koggala Beach is closer to the stop and to the lagoon where you can swim. Long Beach is newer. Only in Long Beach take the Sea View room. There are several rooms with a garden view. They are awful.
Like
You like
•
1
answered 9 years ago
Is there no sea view in Kogalle? I thought both were on the coast
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago
For some reason, Long comes out a little bit (but microscopically) cheaper
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago
Koggala is located a little differently. The main building is farther from the sea than Long Beach. But there are bungalows, and those in the first row with a sea view. And in Long Beach, all rooms, except for a few Garden View, overlook the sea.
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago
Located next to a more expensive long, but the bungalows are similar
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago
Koggala Beach is cozier than Long Beach. Pi booking choose a room in a bungalow.
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago
Koggala is more comfortable because it means more expensive? what is comfort?
and if you compare 2 standard numbers there and there? no bungalow?
and if you compare 2 standard numbers there and there? no bungalow?
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago
Well, I didn’t buy it anymore, but I infected my friends, and others bought it. But a three-ruble note ... they will tell.)
It’s somehow suspiciously inexpensive, like 70,000 rubles for the nose on NG, I’m going, sorry, to Poland: 15,000 tickets, 25,000 hotels, another 25,000, let’s say, will go for food ... = 65,000
Funny difference, but the flight, the ocean...
It’s somehow suspiciously inexpensive, like 70,000 rubles for the nose on NG, I’m going, sorry, to Poland: 15,000 tickets, 25,000 hotels, another 25,000, let’s say, will go for food ... = 65,000
Funny difference, but the flight, the ocean...
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago
That is, I confused the topic a little, the alignment is as follows: for 70,000 on the nose, one couple went to Zanzibar, which I also raved about, the other - for 100,000 for two in total to Sri Lanka. When I start comparing the budget of tours with Europe, I suddenly understand a simple thing: everything has been pulled up to the same amounts.
Like
You like
answered 9 years ago