Question o Hurghada
Ask a Question
Ask a question
Related question «Hotel selection»
There is a question about choosing a hotel - Pharaoh Azur Resort or Seagull. The fact that one is in the city and the other is not is of no interest. The question is about the hotel - food, service, sea and territory
There is a question about choosing a hotel - Pharaoh Azur Resort or Seagull. The fact that one is in the city and the other is not is of no interest. The question is about the hotel - food, service, sea and territory
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
Answers • 11
to these hotels they also offered SUNRISE HOLIDAYS RESORT 5 * what to choose?
Like
You like
answered 3 years ago
Was not in the first one. Briefly about the second. Strong four. Rooms are better to take in the new building. Two beaches, deeper and shallower. The beach of the old building overlooks the lagoon - accordingly, sand, fine, no wind. On both beaches, there may be problems with free sun loungers. Plenty of food, plenty of it. It is especially cool that you can go to the restaurant of the old or new building at will. The staff is friendly, cleaning is normal (as everywhere in Egypt). The first hotel I would love to return to.
Like
You like
•
4
answered 3 years ago
Sunrise holiday 300% !!! Compare Sunrise and Segal, it's like barley and oysters.
mindguru, for you the first hotel you want to return to, but for me the first one I moved from
mindguru, for you the first hotel you want to return to, but for me the first one I moved from
Like
You like
•
1
answered 3 years ago
Lord, I did not see, sorry. Between Sunrise and Seagull.... of course. Sunrise
Like
You like
•
1.5
answered 3 years ago
Tania06082012, and what are the general criteria for choosing a hotel? I ask, because in comparison you give hotels that are not comparable at all.
According to Segal: We rested a year ago, already in a pandemic. Average ... And, given that the hotel is quite inexpensive for the Egyptians, then imagine how many of them there ...... and always. So the restaurant is terrible, on the beach - "laundry" at a depth from the waist to the chest. Along the beach: in front of the old hotel there is a lagoon. Yes, there is no wind, but mud, everything floats there, nothing floats up. The second beach is good, but at low tide near the buoys, a person of average height reaches the bottom. The territory is good, water park, zoo, food, as everywhere in mid-level hotels, the location is convenient.
According to Sunrise: I don’t know how it is now, before it was a hotel with an age limit of 14+. Therefore, if you are flying with younger children, check. And so a good hotel (was before).
According to the Pharaoh: there is no sea, shallow water, to get to the depths, to stomp on the pantone for a long time.
According to Segal: We rested a year ago, already in a pandemic. Average ... And, given that the hotel is quite inexpensive for the Egyptians, then imagine how many of them there ...... and always. So the restaurant is terrible, on the beach - "laundry" at a depth from the waist to the chest. Along the beach: in front of the old hotel there is a lagoon. Yes, there is no wind, but mud, everything floats there, nothing floats up. The second beach is good, but at low tide near the buoys, a person of average height reaches the bottom. The territory is good, water park, zoo, food, as everywhere in mid-level hotels, the location is convenient.
According to Sunrise: I don’t know how it is now, before it was a hotel with an age limit of 14+. Therefore, if you are flying with younger children, check. And so a good hotel (was before).
According to the Pharaoh: there is no sea, shallow water, to get to the depths, to stomp on the pantone for a long time.
Like
You like
•
1
answered 3 years ago
what kind of Segal, what are you, it’s like Roma plus or minus, like LePasha ... not, of course, only Sunrise ...
Like
You like
•
1
answered 3 years ago
I haven’t been to SUNRISE HOLIDAYS RESORT 5 *, but judging by the latest reviews, the people are happy, they would fly into it, since it’s still a five against Segal, who, whatever one may say, is a four, especially if the territorial placement does not bother, Segal has +, which it’s in the center. I’ve been to Seagal twice, though a long time ago, I liked it the first time, the second had its drawbacks, and I read reviews and statements over the past years, I see that the hotel is “losing its brand”, and the price tag is high.
Like
You like
answered 3 years ago