Skiff is no longer the same

Written: 23 august 2012
Travel time: 20 july — 1 august 2012
Who does the author recommend the hotel to?: For a relaxing holiday; For families with children
Your rating of this hotel:
6.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms: 8.0
Service: 5.0
Cleanliness: 7.0
Food: 8.0
Amenities: 7.0
We rested in Skif 46 for the second time, in 2011 we left delighted and we didn’t have any “pink glasses”, everything was just really cool. This year, surprise upon surprise. Firstly, it turned out the same as in Elena’s previous review, when booking I was told one amount, I made an advance payment, and when I arrived they counted 8 thousand more. The holiday began with "butting" with the administrator about the payment, as a result, I achieved that I would pay only the previously agreed amount, but, you see, it is unpleasant to start the holiday with this. For the transfer, they also dreamed of taking money from us 2 times))) Surprise No. 2 - the beach, or rather its complete absence. Nobody said about the fact that the beach was broken in winter. In other hotels, delivery to the beach is organized (free! ) Here, get as you like for 10 gr. from a person. I have no complaints about the rooms, about the cafe and the food in it, too, everything is the same as last year. We didn't have any ants in our rooms. When leaving, again an unpleasant surprise, the administrator began to demand money for a late check-out (we left at 18.30), despite the fact that we had paid in full for 11 days, and we also entered in the evening. I had to figure it out again. Of course, any problems can be solved, we still had a good rest, I love Nikolayevka, I love Crimea in general, but I won’t go to Skif 46, which I liked so much in 2011.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original