We rested in Karabakh in 2010, with our parents. They lived in a 3-storey building on the 2nd floor with amenities on the block. The rooms are ordinary (old beds, furniture not the first freshness) of the amenities, only a small TV. We lived in a 2-storey wooden building with "private amenities" (there is a shared toilet and washbasin in the room, a little better than the public one.
… More ▾
We rested in Karabakh in 2010, with our parents. They lived in a 3-storey building on the 2nd floor with amenities on the block. The rooms are ordinary (old beds, furniture not the first freshness) of the amenities, only a small TV.
We lived in a 2-storey wooden building with "private amenities" (there is a shared toilet and washbasin in the room, a little better than the public one. The shower in the building did not work, so we ran to our parents to wash. Two Soviet-era beds and a small refrigerator. In that In the heat of 2010, the doors to the room were kept constantly open so as not to fry. There is a fan rental service at the base, but they are Soviet-era, like from a museum, and buzz as if a bomber is flying over you.
The food is poor, the only plus is that you can pay by the day, it is convenient if you travel a lot on excursions. The dining room is terribly hot, no fans let alone air conditioners.
The beach is normal, but you need to take a place under a canopy in the morning. The water is very clean which is a big plus. BUT the big minus is the way from the body to the beach and back. It’s still nothing to go down, but after water procedures it’s not very pleasant to go uphill. The territory of the base is large, a large park, but neglected, the most annoying thing is that the base has potential, but they don’t want to develop it. They try to squeeze the maximum out of the legacy of the Soviet era.
We lived in a 2-storey wooden building with "private amenities" (there is a shared toilet and washbasin in the room, a little better than the public one. The shower in the building did not work, so we ran to our parents to wash. Two Soviet-era beds and a small refrigerator. In that In the heat of 2010, the doors to the room were kept constantly open so as not to fry. There is a fan rental service at the base, but they are Soviet-era, like from a museum, and buzz as if a bomber is flying over you.
The food is poor, the only plus is that you can pay by the day, it is convenient if you travel a lot on excursions. The dining room is terribly hot, no fans let alone air conditioners.
The beach is normal, but you need to take a place under a canopy in the morning. The water is very clean which is a big plus. BUT the big minus is the way from the body to the beach and back. It’s still nothing to go down, but after water procedures it’s not very pleasant to go uphill. The territory of the base is large, a large park, but neglected, the most annoying thing is that the base has potential, but they don’t want to develop it. They try to squeeze the maximum out of the legacy of the Soviet era.
Like
You like
• 8
Show other comments …
We rested in TOK Karabakh in August 2009. Before the trip, we read various reviews about this camp site on the Internet - all of them were not very positive, so we drove with caution. But, as soon as we arrived at the place, we liked everything there at first sight: cozy wooden houses, alleys, the embankment, the beach.
… More ▾
We rested in TOK Karabakh in August 2009. Before the trip, we read various reviews about this camp site on the Internet - all of them were not very positive, so we drove with caution. But, as soon as we arrived at the place, we liked everything there at first sight: cozy wooden houses, alleys, the embankment, the beach... The food is good, you can go on various excursions from the embankment, there is a market, the sea is clean, the beach is good, quite close to the sea not far away, the hostel is illuminated in the evening. There are really a couple of but: a shower that works from 17:00 to 18:30, sockets that are not available in the houses. In general, TOK Karabakh is a great place to relax, we will definitely come back to you!! !
Like
You like
• 1.5
The impression is bad: a completely "Soviet" Rest House. In the entire complex in the evenings - darkness, decorative lamps, not knowing the road, you won't find the road the first time and you can be seriously injured. There is a nice park, but the sewer drain is straight into the sea, and the scent spreads over a very large area.
… More ▾
The impression is bad: a completely "Soviet" Rest House. In the entire complex in the evenings - darkness, decorative lamps, not knowing the road, you won't find the road the first time and you can be seriously injured. There is a nice park, but the sewer drain is straight into the sea, and the scent spreads over a very large area. There were power outages during my shift. In buildings with all amenities, maids are not allowed into the building after 00 hours, it's good that they don't report immoral behavior to work.
Like
You like
• 2
I rested at this base every year from 2002 to 2005. I must say that I am a very unpretentious tourist, if there is beautiful nature around, there is where to wash and eat, then this is quite enough for me. And indeed, while the base belonged to "Krymtur", neither the living conditions, nor food, nor the territory caused any particular complaints.
… More ▾
I rested at this base every year from 2002 to 2005. I must say that I am a very unpretentious tourist, if there is beautiful nature around, there is where to wash and eat, then this is quite enough for me. And indeed, while the base belonged to "Krymtur", neither the living conditions, nor food, nor the territory caused any particular complaints. And the lights worked, and the territory was normally cleaned, and the houses were maintained in a more or less normal condition. Moreover, taking into account the cost of accommodation and meals, it was simply impossible to find something better for this money. And they even tried to entertain vacationers, organized magnificent excursions with experienced instructors (after all, it was just a camp site). But, unfortunately, 2005 was the last year when it became clear that there was no point in resting at this base. Yes, probably, the beauty of the underwater world is indeed a big plus, but since 2005, the lights could still be repaired. . . After all, in the evenings there is nothing to do at the base itself, because. k. all cafes are located on the waterfront. And even if you don’t go to a cafe, but just want to sit on the seashore in the evening, then it’s really not very fun to return back without lighting. About the terrible food in 2005 (before that there were no complaints, but on the contrary only praise! ) I don’t even want to write, and this despite the fact that I repeat - I am a completely unpretentious person in this regard. I can note one plus in the diet of 2005 - the constant availability of kefir for dinner, and sometimes for breakfast - we collected so much that we found great use for it - we soaked meat in it for barbecue (we were in a car and it was easy to hit the road to Alushta for meat) . Well, otherwise, I got the impression that the new owners absolutely do not care about the vacationers and they are just waiting for the houses to completely fall apart and they will build expensive hotels in their place. It's a pity, because the place is really very beautiful. . .
Like
You like
• 4.5
