Did not like

Written: 2 october 2013
Travel time: 17 — 19 september 2013
Your rating of this hotel:
5.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms: 5.0
Service: 4.0
Cleanliness: 7.0
Food: 8.0
Amenities: 4.0
The hotel left a mixed impression.
It looks like a lot of money has been invested in it. But too many "flaws" climbs in the process.
The standard room is spacious but empty. No bedside tables, no locker, no closet: nothing. Even the semblance of a table in front of the bed - with a not very aesthetic hole (maybe there used to be a pull-out shelf? . . ).
Light stained carpet.
The walls are grey. Stylish. But uncomfortable.
Very large, uncomfortable pillows.
But a nice fluffy bathrobe and normal slippers.
There are a lot of little things in the bathroom (except for shampoo, conditioner and gel, which, by the way, were not replenished, there are toothpaste and brush sets, a comb, and some other boxes).
It is not clear why, but the shower has no foundation and all the water spills over the bathroom. At the same time, the rug gets wet, which, of course, smells chronically unpleasant.
I especially want to note the temple service.

Breakfast a la carte, you can order in the room, you can - in the restaurant. Tasty, but not on time (was at least half an hour late). In order for the dishes to be removed from the room after breakfast, a separate insistent request is needed.
Cleaning - after it became clear the need to hang a sign about it.
The biggest plus of the hotel is the chef in the restaurant (the entourage itself and the service in it are so-so): oh-oh-very tasty! But not cheap.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original